ASTM E2348-24 PDF
Standard Guide for Framework for a Consensus-based Environmental Decision-making Process
Standard Guide for Framework for a Consensus-based Environmental Decision-making Process
- Статус документа:
- Действующий
- Формат:
- Электронный (PDF)
- Количество страниц:
- 10
- Дата публикации:
- 1 февраля 2024 г.
- Издание:
- E2348
- ICS:
- 13.020.20
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 This standard guide is designed to help the owners and regulators of a specific environmental problem to identify and integrate affected stakeholders and establish a process to identify and work through all the key questions and answers essential to a mutually acceptable decision. This standard guide presents a “framework” that is intended to help ensure that all the CBED process components (that is, human health, ecological condition, socio-cultural values and economic well-being) are considered, but is designed to allow the user to interpret which components of the process are applicable and how these components are defined for the specific environmental problem being addressed. It also provides general guidance to help with selecting approaches and methods for specific analyses of each of the major CBED components (that is, human health, ecological condition, socio-cultural values, and economic well-being). The CBED process can be easily coupled with other relevant standards (for example Guides E1739, E1984, E2205, and E2876) and environmental compliance guidance and requirements, for example, Quality of Stakeholder-Based Decisions and Understanding Risk, 40 CRF 1501, 10 CFR 20, and Marine Mammals Protection Act of 1972. 5.2 The CBED process is appropriate in two contexts: (1) when a specific project is proposed; and (2) when there are or may be public concerns about specific health, environmental, cultural, social or economic issues. CERCLA § 128(a) grantees will find the CBED process useful for community engagement activities such as the analysis of brownfields cleanup alternatives. 5.3 Involving affected stakeholders actively in the decision-making process reorients that process from one dominated by regulators and owners to one that includes those who live with the consequences of the decision. This not only increases the successful implementation of decisions, but also can promote greater trust in government, industry and other institutions (See Se... SCOPE 1.1 This guide presents a framework for a stakeholder-focused Consensus-based Environmental Decision-making (CBED) process, which is a stakeholder-empowered, process to prioritize and select actions to be initiated with the goal of optimizing many types of environmental decisions that may affect a community or communities. 1.2 This guide is intended to describe a highly flexible CBED process, and therefore does not recommend a specific course of action for this activity. 1.3 This guide is intended to assist in implementing a CBED process, which allows assessing the full impact of any project- or issue-related decisions related to human health, ecological, socio-cultural or economic impacts.2 1.3.1 States and Tribes applying for CERCLA §128(a) Brownfields grants may find this guide useful when developing and implementing their meaningful public participation and community engagement programs. 1.4 This guide is not intended to replace existing environmental decision-making or public participation processes. It may be used with other processes or standards that address stakeholder involvement in environmental decision-making. 1.5 Limitations—This standard does not address the specific methods for generating or evaluating technical data related to assessing a particular environmental issues. The user should seek other sources on methods to gather information for completion of models or other analyses that may be used during a CBED process. This standard may not fully address the rights of owners of real property or the potential impact (positive or negative) on the value of real property of a decision made using this process. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technica...
Abstract
Overview
ASTM E2348-24: Standard Guide for Framework for a Consensus-based Environmental Decision-making Process establishes a comprehensive, stakeholder-driven process for making environmental decisions. Developed by ASTM International, this guide provides a flexible framework to integrate affected stakeholders and address all relevant human health, ecological, socio-cultural, and economic components. It is especially valuable for communities, regulators, and owners managing environmental issues that could impact various groups. The guide promotes informed consent, transparency, and inclusive participation, leading to decisions that are widely supported and more effectively implemented.
Key Topics
- Stakeholder Integration: Central to this guide is the early and active participation of affected stakeholders throughout the decision-making process. Stakeholders help define problems, clarify questions, and directly participate in developing solutions.
- Consensus-based Approach: The framework fosters agreement among diverse parties by encouraging open dialogue, negotiation, and trade-offs, moving beyond regulator-dominated decisions.
- Flexible Process: The CBED framework is adaptable, allowing users to determine which components-human health, ecological, socio-cultural, and economic-are most relevant for a specific environmental problem.
- Iterative Steps: The process includes identification of stakeholders, information gathering, option generation and impact forecasting, obtaining informed consent, and implementation with ongoing evaluation. This iterative structure accommodates changing conditions and new data.
- Analytical Guidance: While not prescribing specific technical data or methodologies, the guide offers support for selecting appropriate approaches to analyze each major component pertinent to a decision.
Applications
ASTM E2348-24 is applicable in a wide range of environmental contexts, notably:
- Project Proposals: When launching a project with potential environmental impacts, this guide helps ensure that all affected groups are heard and that their concerns are addressed through consensus.
- Public Concerns: In cases where health, environmental, cultural, social, or economic issues arise, the CBED process aids stakeholders and regulators in collaboratively navigating complex issues.
- Community Engagement: Ideal for state and tribal agencies applying for CERCLA §128(a) Brownfields grants, especially during public participation and community consultation phases.
- Policy Integration: The guide is designed to be used in conjunction with existing public participation or environmental decision-making processes, enhancing inclusivity and transparency.
- Comprehensive Analysis: Organizations can consider the full scope of impacts-from human health to economic consequences-when making decisions, promoting balanced and mutually acceptable solutions.
Related Standards
ASTM E2348-24 aligns with and can complement the following standards and regulatory references:
- ASTM E1739: Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites
- ASTM E1984: Guide for Brownfields Redevelopment
- ASTM E2205: Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action for Protection of Ecological Resources
- ASTM E2876: Guide for Integrating Sustainable Objectives into Cleanup
- ASTM E3356: Guide for Stakeholder Engagement on Environmental Risk Management and Climate
Regulatory References:
- Quality of Stakeholder-Based Decisions and Understanding Risk (40 CFR Part 1501-1506)
- Standards for Protection Against Radiation (10 CFR Part 20)
- Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972
- Guidance from the US EPA and Department of Interior on collaborative decision-making
Practical Value
By implementing ASTM E2348-24, organizations, regulators, and communities benefit from:
- Greater Trust: Actively involving stakeholders increases public trust in outcomes and institutions.
- Reduced Conflict: Early and ongoing engagement can help avoid litigation and project delays.
- Custom Solutions: The flexible framework can be tailored to local needs and specific environmental issues.
- Improved Outcomes: Consensus-built decisions are more likely to be implemented successfully and deliver lasting benefits.
In short, ASTM E2348-24 is a key resource for any initiative seeking to integrate diverse interests, ensure compliance, and optimize the sustainability and acceptance of environmental decisions.
Технические детали
- Технический комитет
- E50 - Environmental Assessment, Risk Management and Corrective Action
- SKU
- ASTM E2348-24
Похожие стандарты
Другие стандарты ASTM
ASTM-TPT-47
Phase I & Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Processes
Phase I & Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Processes
ASTM-TPT-8
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Practices For Commercial Real Estate: Phase I Site Assessment & Transac…
ASTM-TPT-1137
ASTM D975 Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel
ASTM D975 Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel
ASTM-TPT-1202
ASTM D8421 Standard Test Method for Determination of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Aqueous Ma…
ASTM D8421 Standard Test Method -- eLearning Course
ASTM-TPT-691
Microaprendizagem para D4057: Amostragem de ponto (PT)
D4057 Microlearning: Spot Sampling Portuguese
ASTM-TPT-1091
Metodo de prueba estandar D4052 de ASTM -- Curso de aprendizaje electrónico (ES)
Modulo eLearning para ASTM D4052 en espanol
ASTM ACEM20180086
Using Neutron Radiography to Quantify the Settlement of Fresh Concrete
Specifications have been implemented for concrete bridge decks in North America that restrict the use of higher slump concrete mixtures primarily because of concerns about differential settlement and…
ASTM ACEM20180041
Experimental Study of Competing Failure of Reinforced Concrete Based on the Weibull Distribution
To predict the failure lifetime of reinforced concrete, a current accelerating corrosion test was performed on concrete by simulating the environment in an area with saline soil. To study the concret…