ASTM E2984/E2984M-21 PDF
Standard Practice for Acoustic Emission Examination of High Pressure, Low Carbon, Forged Piping using Controlled Hydrostatic Pressurization
Standard Practice for Acoustic Emission Examination of High Pressure, Low Carbon, Forged Piping using Controlled Hydrostatic Pressurization
- Статус документа:
- Действующий
- Формат:
- Электронный (PDF)
- Количество страниц:
- 7
- Дата публикации:
- 1 ноября 2021 г.
- Издание:
- E2984/E2984M
- ICS:
- 91.120.20
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 High pressure fluids being pumped in all oil field applications often stress iron pipes where subsequent failure can lead to injury to personnel or equipment. These forgings are typically constructed from 4700 series low carbon steel with a wall thickness in excess of 1.25 cm [0.5 in.], dependent on the manufacturers' specification. The standard method to certify that these iron segments can withstand operational pressures is to perform dye penetrant (PT) or magnetic particle penetrant (MT) tests, or both, to reveal defects (cracks and corrosion). As these methods are subject to interpretation by the human eye, it is desirable to employ a technique whereby a sensor based system can provide a signal to either pass or fail the test object. To that end, the acoustic emission (AE) method provides the requisite data from which acceptance/rejection can be made by a computer, taking the human out of the loop, providing that a human has correctly programmed the acceptance criteria. Most of these pipe segments are not linear, thus a 3D defect location method is desirable. The 3D source indication represents the spatial location of the defect without regard to its orientation, recognizing the source location is only approximate due to sound propagation through the part and water bath. 5.2 The immersed 3D approach is found to be preferable due to the large number of parts to be examined. The 3D system is easily replicated and standardized in that all sensor locations are fixed to the exterior of the fluid bath. Multiple parts may be easily placed into an assembly, allowing all to be examined in a single test, thus accelerating throughput. Attaching a minimum of eight AE sensors to the tank enhances the probability that a sufficient number of AE hits in an event will occur, allowing for an approximate location determination. When an indication of a defect is observed, the subject part is identified by the spatial location allowing it to be removed for further examination... SCOPE 1.1 This practice is no longer being updated but is being retained for historical value as it represents the only AE practice using hydrostatic testing in which the sensors are not in direct contact with the part. 1.2 In the preferred embodiment, this practice examines immersed low carbon, forged piping being immersed in a water tank with the acoustic sensors permanently mounted on the tank walls rather than temporarily on the part itself. The pipes are monitored while being internally loaded (stressed) by hydrostatic means up to 1000 bar. 1.3 This practice examines either an immersed pipe, or non-immersed pipe being stressed by internal hydrostatic means to create acoustic emissions when cracks are present. However, the non-immersed method is time consuming, requiring placement and removal of sensors for each pipe inspected, while the immersed method has sensors permanently mounted, providing consistent sensor coupling to the tank-eliminating reinstallation. The non-immersed method is not recommended for the specified reasons and only the immersed method will be discussed throughout the remainder of the practice. This is similar to pressure vessel testing described in Practice E569, but uses hydrostatic means not included in that standard. 1.4 This Acoustic Emission (AE) method addresses examination for monitoring low carbon, forged piping systems being internally loaded (stressed) by hydrostatic means up to 1000 bar [15,000 psi] while being immersed in a water bath to facilitate sensor coupling. 1.5 The basic functions of an AE monitoring system are to detect, locate, and classify emission sources. Other methods of nondestructive testing (NDT) may be used to further evaluate the significance of acoustic emission sources. 1.6 This practice can be used to replace visual methods, which are unreliable and have significant safety risks. 1.7 This practice describes procedures to install and monitor acoustic...
Abstract
Overview
ASTM E2984/E2984M-21 specifies the standard practice for the acoustic emission (AE) examination of high pressure, low carbon, forged piping using controlled hydrostatic pressurization. This standard, developed by ASTM International, provides comprehensive guidance on how to examine forged piping systems-primarily made of 4700 series low carbon steel-under internal hydrostatic loads up to 1000 bar (15,000 psi). The method is designed for oilfield and industrial applications where high-pressure fluids can stress pipes, potentially causing failure and associated safety risks.
This practice is historically significant as it is the only ASTM AE method using hydrostatic testing with sensors not mounted directly on the piping but on the exterior of the immersion tank, greatly aiding standardization and efficiency.
Key Topics
- Acoustic Emission Testing (AET): AE techniques detect sound waves produced by defect activity such as cracks or corrosion. These emissions enable real-time, non-destructive examination of pressure piping.
- Controlled Hydrostatic Pressurization: Pipes are subjected to gradually increasing internal water pressure while submerged. AE sensors detect and classify emissions indicating stress points or flaws.
- Sensor Placement and 3D Source Location: A minimum of eight AE sensors are permanently fixed to the tank walls, providing reliable, repeatable detection and approximate three-dimensional location of potential defects.
- Comparison to Traditional NDT Methods: AE testing can supplement or replace visual, dye penetrant (PT), and magnetic particle (MT) tests, minimizing human interpretation and increasing safety.
- Historical and Standardization Value: Though not updated further, the standard remains relevant for its unique approach to AE inspection, particularly for complex, non-linear pipe segments found in oilfields.
Applications
ASTM E2984/E2984M-21 finds practical use in several industrial settings:
- Oilfield Pressure Pipe Certification: Ensuring high pressure, low carbon forged piping is free from critical defects before use prevents hazardous failures in oil and gas applications.
- Batch Testing and Throughput Optimization: The immersed AE testing system enables multiple pipe sections to be screened simultaneously, accelerating testing in high-volume production environments.
- Replacement of Risky Visual Inspection: Automated AE methods reduce the subjectivity and safety hazards inherent in manual, visual piping inspections.
- Defect Detection and Location: The system not only detects the existence of flaws but can also estimate their location in three dimensions. This directs further detailed examination or immediate removal of defected parts from the service inventory.
Related Standards
ASTM E2984/E2984M-21 should be considered alongside several other standards that govern nondestructive testing and AE evaluation:
- ASTM E569: Practice for Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Structures During Controlled Stimulation. Similar in methodology but applies to other types of pressure vessel testing.
- ASTM E543: Specification for Agencies Performing Nondestructive Testing. Sets requirements for NDT organizations.
- ASTM E650, E750, E976, E2374: Guidelines covering sensor mounting, instrumentation characterization, reproducibility, and system performance verification for AE methods.
- ANSI/ASNT CP-189, NAS-410, SNT-TC-1A: Standards for qualification and certification of NDT personnel.
Practical Value
The adoption of ASTM E2984/E2984M-21 brings several benefits:
- Improved Detection Reliability: Permanent sensor placement and computer-aided analysis minimize human error and ensure consistent, repeatable test conditions.
- Enhanced Safety: Automated acoustic emission monitoring reduces personnel exposure to risk during high-pressure tests.
- Process Efficiency: The ability to test multiple piping sections simultaneously and quickly identify defective parts supports large-scale industrial inspection programs.
For organizations concerned with the integrity of high-pressure forged piping, especially in harsh environments, this standard provides an advanced, historically significant, and efficient nondestructive testing solution.
Keywords: acoustic emission testing, high pressure piping, hydrostatic pressurization, nondestructive examination, AE sensor location, ASTM E2984
Технические детали
- Технический комитет
- E07 - Nondestructive Testing
- SKU
- ASTM E2984/E2984M-21
Похожие стандарты
Другие стандарты ASTM
ASTM-TPT-47
Phase I & Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Processes
Phase I & Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Processes
ASTM-TPT-8
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Practices For Commercial Real Estate: Phase I Site Assessment & Transac…
ASTM-TPT-1137
ASTM D975 Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel
ASTM D975 Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel
ASTM-TPT-1202
ASTM D8421 Standard Test Method for Determination of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Aqueous Ma…
ASTM D8421 Standard Test Method -- eLearning Course
ASTM-TPT-691
Microaprendizagem para D4057: Amostragem de ponto (PT)
D4057 Microlearning: Spot Sampling Portuguese
ASTM-TPT-1091
Metodo de prueba estandar D4052 de ASTM -- Curso de aprendizaje electrónico (ES)
Modulo eLearning para ASTM D4052 en espanol
ASTM ACEM20180086
Using Neutron Radiography to Quantify the Settlement of Fresh Concrete
Specifications have been implemented for concrete bridge decks in North America that restrict the use of higher slump concrete mixtures primarily because of concerns about differential settlement and…
ASTM ACEM20180041
Experimental Study of Competing Failure of Reinforced Concrete Based on the Weibull Distribution
To predict the failure lifetime of reinforced concrete, a current accelerating corrosion test was performed on concrete by simulating the environment in an area with saline soil. To study the concret…