ISO/SAE PAS 22736:2021 PDF
Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles
Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles
- Статус документа:
- Действующий
- Формат:
- Электронный (PDF)
- Количество страниц:
- 40
- Дата публикации:
- 1 сентября 2021 г.
- Издание:
- ISO/SAE PAS 22736 edition 1 version 1
- ICS:
- 01.040.03
This document describes [motor] vehicle driving automation systems that perform part or all of the dynamic driving task (DDT) on a sustained basis. It provides a taxonomy with detailed definitions for six levels of driving automation, ranging from no driving automation (Level 0) to full driving automation (Level 5), in the context of [motor] vehicles (hereafter also referred to as “vehicle” or “vehicles”) and their operation on roadways: Level 0: No Driving Automation Level 1: Driver Assistance Level 2: Partial Driving Automation Level 3: Conditional Driving Automation Level 4: High Driving Automation Level 5: Full Driving Automation These level definitions, along with additional supporting terms and definitions provided herein, can be used to describe the full range of driving automation features equipped on [motor] vehicles in a functionally consistent and coherent manner. “On‑road” refers to publicly accessible roadways (including parking areas and private campuses that permit public access) that collectively serve all road users, including cyclists, pedestrians, and users of vehicles with and without driving automation features. The levels apply to the driving automation feature(s) that are engaged in any given instance of on-road operation of an equipped vehicle. As such, although a given vehicle may be equipped with a driving automation system that is capable of delivering multiple driving automation features that perform at different levels, the level of driving automation exhibited in any given instance is determined by the feature(s) that are engaged. This document also refers to three primary actors in driving: the (human) user, the driving automation system, and other vehicle systems and components. These other vehicle systems and components (or the vehicle in general terms) do not include the driving automation system in this model, even though as a practical matter a driving automation system may actually share hardware and software components with other vehicle systems, such as a processing module(s) or operating code. The levels of driving automation are defined by reference to the specific role played by each of the three primary actors in performance of the DDT and/or DDT fallback. “Role” in this context refers to the expected role of a given primary actor, based on the design of the driving automation system in question and not necessarily to the actual performance of a given primary actor. For example, a driver who fails to monitor the roadway during engagement of a Level 1 adaptive cruise control (ACC) system still has the role of driver, even while s/he is neglecting it. Active safety systems, such as electronic stability control (ESC) and automatic emergency braking (AEB), and certain types of driver assistance systems, such as lane keeping assistance (LKA), are excluded from the scope of this driving automation taxonomy because they do not perform part or all of the DDT on a sustained basis, but rather provide momentary intervention during potentially hazardous situations. Due to the momentary nature of the actions of active safety systems, their intervention does not change or eliminate the role of the driver in performing part or all of the DDT, and thus are not considered to be driving automation, even though they perform automated functions. In addition, systems that inform, alert, or warn the driver about hazards in the driving environment are also outside the scope of this driving automation taxonomy, as they neither automate part or all of the DDT, nor change the driver’s role in performance of the DDT (see 8.13). It should be noted, however, that crash avoidance features, including intervention-type active safety systems, may be included in vehicles equipped with driving automation systems at any level. For automated driving system (ADS) features (i.e., Levels 3 to 5) that perform the complete DDT, crash mitigation and avoidance capability is part of ADS functionality (see also 8.13).
Abstract
Overview
ISO/SAE PAS 22736:2021 - "Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles" provides a harmonized vocabulary and classification for driving automation. The document defines the dynamic driving task (DDT), introduces a six‑level taxonomy (Level 0–5: No Driving Automation through Full Driving Automation), and clarifies roles among the three primary actors in driving: the human user, the driving automation system (DAS/ADS), and other vehicle systems. It applies to on‑road, publicly accessible roadways (including parking areas and similar locations) and is technically equivalent to SAE J3016 (APR2021).
Key topics and requirements
- Six levels of driving automation (Level 0–5) - functional definitions that describe who is expected to perform the DDT and DDT fallback at each level.
- Roles and responsibilities - explicit assignment of expected roles for the human user, the driving automation system, and other vehicle systems; “role” is based on system design, not user behavior.
- Operational Design Domain (ODD) - significance of ODD for specifying when and where a driving automation feature is intended to operate.
- Scope and exclusions - active safety systems (e.g., ESC, AEB), momentary driver assistance, and driver information/warning systems are excluded because they do not perform the DDT on a sustained basis.
- Supporting definitions and deprecated terms - comprehensive glossary including ADS, OEDR (object and event detection and response) and removal of ambiguous terms (e.g., “autonomous”, “self‑driving”) to encourage consistent use.
- Illustrative material - tables and figures (e.g., levels summary, roles by level, ODD diagrams) to aid classification and communication.
Applications and who uses it
ISO/SAE PAS 22736:2021 is widely used by:
- Automotive OEMs and Tier‑1 suppliers for feature specification, product requirements, and consistent marketing terminology.
- Regulators and policymakers to align legislation, approval criteria, and safety guidance with a common taxonomy.
- System architects, safety engineers and test labs for hazard analysis, safety cases, and defining operational limits (ODD).
- Legal, insurance and procurement teams for contracts, liability assessments, and coverage definitions.
- Researchers and standards developers to ensure interoperability of terminology across studies and standards.
Practical uses include classifying vehicle features during design reviews, documenting operational limits in technical specifications, informing regulatory submissions, and improving cross‑stakeholder communication about automated driving capabilities.
Related standards
- SAE J3016 (APR2021) - technically equivalent taxonomy and definitions
- SAE J3063, SAE J670 and ANSI D16.1 - referenced terminology and related guidance on vehicle dynamics and active safety systems
Keywords: ISO/SAE PAS 22736:2021, driving automation, levels of automation, DDT, ADS, ODD, taxonomy, on‑road motor vehicles.
Технические детали
- Технический комитет
- ISO/TC 204 - Intelligent transport systems
- SKU
- ISO/SAE PAS 22736:2021
Похожие стандарты
Другие стандарты ISO
ISO 8689-1:2000
ДействующийWater quality — Biological classification of rivers — Part 1: Guidance on the interpretation of biological qu…
Overview ISO 8689-1:2000, titled Water quality - Biological classification of rivers - Part 1: Guidance on the interpretation of biological quality data from surveys of benthic macroinvertebrates, is…
ISO/ASTM51540-04(2012)
ОтменёнStandard Practice for Use of a Radiochromic Liquid Dosimetry System (Withdrawn 2020)
Significance and Use4.1 The radiochromic liquid dosimetry system provides a means of measuring absorbed dose in materials (5-7). Under the influence of ionizing radiation, chemical reactions take pla…
ISO/ASTM51204-04
ДействующийStandard Practice for Dosimetry in Gamma Irradiation Facilities for Food Processing (Withdrawn 2013)
Significance and Use4.1 Food products may be treated with ionizing radiation, such as gamma-rays from 60Co or 137Cs sources, for numerous purposes, including control of parasites and pathogenic micro…
ISO/ASTM51431-05
ОтменёнStandard Practice for Dosimetry in Electron Beam and X-Ray (Bremsstrahlung) Irradiation Facilities for Food P…
Significance and Use4.1 Food products may be treated with acceleratorgenerated radiation (electrons and X-rays) for numerous purposes, including control of parasites and pathogenic microorganisms, in…
ISO/ASTM52628-20e1
ДействующийStandard Practice for Dosimetry in Radiation Processing
1.1 This practice describes the basic requirements that apply when making absorbed dose measurements in accordance with the ASTM E61 series of dosimetry standards. In addition, it provides guidance o…
ISO/ASTM52921-13(2019)
ДействующийStandard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing—Coordinate Systems and Test Methodologies
Significance and Use 3.1 Although many additive manufacturing systems are based heavily upon the principles of Computer Numerical Control (CNC), the coordinate systems and nomenclature specific to CN…
ISO/ASTMTR52917-EB
ДействующийAdditive Manufacturing — Round Robin Testing — General Guidelines
This document outlines the steps with regard to aspects of design to conduct and run a round robin study (RRS) to assess the degree of variability in an additive manufacturing material or process. Th…
ISO/ASTM52901-17(2023)
ДействующийStandard Guide for Additive Manufacturing – General Principles – Requirements for Purchased AM Parts
Scope 1.1 This document defines and specifies requirements for purchased parts made by additive manufacturing. 1.2 It gives guidelines for the elements to be exchanged between the customer and the pa…